Skip to content
NOWCAST WISN 12 News This Morning
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

Why the sentence imposed on Michigan school shooter Ethan Crumbley is significant

Why the sentence imposed on Michigan school shooter Ethan Crumbley is significant
With that. The court having read the P SI and being fully familiar with the defendant. And the underlying facts of this case believes that it is in the best interest of justice as well as proportionate to the needs of this case to sentence. Defendant as follows as it relates to do 2022 279506 FC count one terrorism causing death. Census of the court is that defendant shall serve life without the possibility of parole credit for eight days served counts two through five homicide, first degree premeditated murder, juvenile defendant c of the courts that finish shall serve the rest of his life without the possibility of parole with the Michigan Department of Corrections. Credit for eight days served on count six through 12 assault with intent to murder on each of the counts. Defendant is sentenced to 18 years and nine months to 80 years with the Michigan Department of Corrections credit for eight days served on counts 13 through 24. Those being felony. Firearm defendant is sentenced to two years with the Michigan Department of Corrections on each of those counts with credit for 730 days served. Counts one through 12 are concurrent to each other and count 13 through 24 are concurrent to each other. Count. One is consecutive to count. 13, count two is consecutive to count. 14, count three is consecutive to count. 15. Count four is consecutive to count. 16. Count five is consecutive to count. 17. Count six is consecutive to count. 18. Count seven is consecutive to count. 19 count eight is consecutive to count 20 count nine is consecutive to count 21. Count 10 is consecutive to count 22. Count 11 is consecutive to 23 and count 12 is consecutive to count 24. All of those consecutive counts are by reason of the felony firearm statute. Is there *** challenge to restitution? Here is your honor. Thank you. Restitution will be set in the amount of $20,781.
Advertisement
Why the sentence imposed on Michigan school shooter Ethan Crumbley is significant
More than two years after Michigan’s deadliest school shooting, a judge imposed a historic sentence – and the harshest possible penalty – for the teenage gunman.Oakland County Circuit Court Judge Kwamé Rowe sentenced Ethan Crumbley, 17, on Friday to life in prison without the possibility of parole for the November 2021 shooting that left four students dead at Oxford High School. Six other students and a teacher were also wounded in the attack.It’s a punishment that has become both rare and a point of contention over concerns about sentencing a minor to die in a cell before they reach full maturity.Crumbley, who was 15 at the time of the shooting, became the first minor to receive an original sentence of life without the possibility of parole in more than a decade since the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012 banned mandatory life sentences for juveniles and ruled courts should consider the circumstances of each defendant and their maturity before such punishments are handed down.Before issuing his sentence, Rowe told families of the victims who appeared in court that he knew “whatever sentence the court imposes will not bring your loved ones back or cure the mental anguish or the lifelong physical scars that some of you have, but I hope the sentence does allow you to close one chapter in your life.”The judge dismissed last-minute pleas by Crumbley’s attorney who stated the teen’s life was salvageable. Rowe noted the “defendant in his own words” told the court, “This is nobody’s fault but his own.”Judge considered likelihood of rehabilitationRowe, who was appointed to the 6th Circuit Court of Oakland County in 2021 by Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, made history after becoming the second Black man to serve on the Sixth Circuit bench, according to the county website.In September, Rowe made headlines following his ruling that Crumbley would be eligible for life in prison without the possibility of parole.Rowe considered the teen’s behavior both before the mass shooting and during his time in custody, he said.“It’s clear to this court the defendant had an obsession with violence before the shooting,” Rowe said, citing Crumbley’s disturbing writings and documented violence against animals before the attack. Rowe said Crumbley’s rehabilitation in prison is unlikely because of his “obsession” with violence.Video below: Buck Myre talks about his son Tate, a victim in the Oxford High School shootingShooter’s sentence came as state considers banning such punishments for minorsIn a 2012 ruling, the US Supreme Court deemed it unconstitutional to sentence minors to mandatory life without the possibility of parole. The high court heard arguments urging them not to “give up” on child offenders who are still a work in progress, emotionally and developmentally, as one attorney called it.Justice Elena Kagan said in the court’s opinion it would be wrong for states to ignore the chance that these now-adult inmates may someday be rehabilitated.“The mandatory sentencing schemes before us violate this principle of proportionality, and so violate the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment,” Kagan said.In a dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said, “When the majority of this court countermands that democratic decision (by state legislatures), what the majority is saying is that members of society must be exposed to the risk that these convicted murders, if released from custody, will murder again.”Because of the ruling, court hearings are now held before sentencing to determine whether a possible life sentence is appropriate.Earlier this year, lawmakers in Michigan introduced bipartisan legislation to ban minors from being sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. At least 26 other states have passed laws prohibiting these sentences.“The Supreme Court has made clear that life without parole sentences for young people should be rare,” state Sen. Sylvia Santana said. “The Michigan Supreme Court has placed the burden on the prosecuting attorney to prove by clear and convincing evidence that a young person is one of the rare people who should receive a life without parole sentence.”Under the proposed legislation, juvenile offenders would be given a minimum sentence of no less than 10 years and a maximum sentence of no more than 60 years, with a possible parole review after 10 years, according to a news release from Michigan Senate Democrats.CNN’s Ray Sanchez, Nicki Brown, Aditi Sanga, Lauren del Valle, Holly Yan and Bill Mears contributed to this report

More than two years after Michigan’s deadliest school shooting, a judge imposed a historic sentence – and the harshest possible penalty – for the teenage gunman.

Oakland County Circuit Court Judge Kwamé Rowe sentenced Ethan Crumbley, 17, on Friday to life in prison without the possibility of parole for the November 2021 shooting that left four students dead at Oxford High School. Six other students and a teacher were also wounded in the attack.

Advertisement

It’s a punishment that has become both rare and a point of contention over concerns about sentencing a minor to die in a cell before they reach full maturity.

Crumbley, who was 15 at the time of the shooting, became the first minor to receive an original sentence of life without the possibility of parole in more than a decade since the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012 banned mandatory life sentences for juveniles and ruled courts should consider the circumstances of each defendant and their maturity before such punishments are handed down.

Before issuing his sentence, Rowe told families of the victims who appeared in court that he knew “whatever sentence the court imposes will not bring your loved ones back or cure the mental anguish or the lifelong physical scars that some of you have, but I hope the sentence does allow you to close one chapter in your life.”

The judge dismissed last-minute pleas by Crumbley’s attorney who stated the teen’s life was salvageable. Rowe noted the “defendant in his own words” told the court, “This is nobody’s fault but his own.”

Judge considered likelihood of rehabilitation

Rowe, who was appointed to the 6th Circuit Court of Oakland County in 2021 by Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, made history after becoming the second Black man to serve on the Sixth Circuit bench, according to the county website.

In September, Rowe made headlines following his ruling that Crumbley would be eligible for life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Rowe considered the teen’s behavior both before the mass shooting and during his time in custody, he said.

“It’s clear to this court the defendant had an obsession with violence before the shooting,” Rowe said, citing Crumbley’s disturbing writings and documented violence against animals before the attack. Rowe said Crumbley’s rehabilitation in prison is unlikely because of his “obsession” with violence.

Video below: Buck Myre talks about his son Tate, a victim in the Oxford High School shooting

Shooter’s sentence came as state considers banning such punishments for minors

In a 2012 ruling, the US Supreme Court deemed it unconstitutional to sentence minors to mandatory life without the possibility of parole. The high court heard arguments urging them not to “give up” on child offenders who are still a work in progress, emotionally and developmentally, as one attorney called it.

Justice Elena Kagan said in the court’s opinion it would be wrong for states to ignore the chance that these now-adult inmates may someday be rehabilitated.

“The mandatory sentencing schemes before us violate this principle of proportionality, and so violate the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment,” Kagan said.

In a dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said, “When the majority of this court countermands that democratic decision (by state legislatures), what the majority is saying is that members of society must be exposed to the risk that these convicted murders, if released from custody, will murder again.”

Because of the ruling, court hearings are now held before sentencing to determine whether a possible life sentence is appropriate.

Earlier this year, lawmakers in Michigan introduced bipartisan legislation to ban minors from being sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. At least 26 other states have passed laws prohibiting these sentences.

“The Supreme Court has made clear that life without parole sentences for young people should be rare,” state Sen. Sylvia Santana said. “The Michigan Supreme Court has placed the burden on the prosecuting attorney to prove by clear and convincing evidence that a young person is one of the rare people who should receive a life without parole sentence.”

Under the proposed legislation, juvenile offenders would be given a minimum sentence of no less than 10 years and a maximum sentence of no more than 60 years, with a possible parole review after 10 years, according to a news release from Michigan Senate Democrats.

CNN’s Ray Sanchez, Nicki Brown, Aditi Sanga, Lauren del Valle, Holly Yan and Bill Mears contributed to this report